Jane App pricing in 2026: what it really costs at one, two and three practitioners
Jane publishes $59, $79 and $99 plans and a $15 AI scribe, but never the per practitioner charge. Here is the bill at one, two and three practitioners.
October 28, 2026 · 11 min read
Jane App publishes three monthly plans on its US pricing page: Balance at $59, Practice at $79 and Thrive at $99, each including one full time practitioner, plus an AI Scribe at $15 per month per practitioner who switches it on. Card processing is 2.85% plus $0.25 online and 2.6% plus $0.10 in person. Insurance billing is a separate add-on at $20 a month for the account, plus $5 per extra full time practitioner and $2.50 per part time one. Those figures were read on Jane's pricing page on October 28, 2026.
What the page does not publish is the number that actually decides your bill: the monthly charge for practitioner two and practitioner three. The plan cards say "per part time practitioner" and "per full time practitioner" with no dollar amount attached. The only way to see it is to scroll to the "Calculate your monthly rate" widget, pick a plan, type in how many licenses you have, and read the estimate it spits out. That is a deliberate design choice, and it is the single biggest reason people land on a page like this one looking for a straight answer before they talk to anyone.
So here is the straight answer, with the parts we can verify separated from the part only Jane can tell you.
What Jane publishes, plan by plan
| Plan | Monthly list price | Practitioners included | Notable limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | $59 | 1 practitioner profile | 20 appointments per month |
| Practice | $79 | 1 full time practitioner | no appointment cap |
| Thrive | $99 | 1 full time practitioner | adds advanced scheduling and retention tools |
| AI Scribe | $15 per practitioner | per opted in practitioner | 5 free notes on every plan |
| Insurance Billing | $20 per account | plus $5 per extra full time practitioner | add-on, applies account wide |
Two definitions on that page matter more than they look. Part time means fewer than 24 booked hours a week, full time means 24 or more. And admin or front desk staff who have no bookable hours are free, which is genuinely good news for a clinic with two clinicians and two receptionists.
The Balance cap is the other thing to read twice. Balance is limited to 20 appointments a month, counted as invoices created, and to a single practitioner profile. Twenty appointments is roughly one working week for a busy therapist. If you are doing 60 or 80 visits a month, Balance is not your plan no matter what the price says, and the $59 headline is not the number you should be comparing against anything.
The number Jane does not print
Jane's own calculator is the only published route to the per practitioner figure, and the calculator is also where the page tells clinics with 10 or more licenses to contact the team instead. We are not going to guess that number and we are not going to repeat a figure from a review site that may be two price changes out of date. If you are evaluating Jane for a two or three person practice, do this before anything else:
- Open the pricing page and scroll to "Calculate your monthly rate."
- Pick the plan you would actually buy, which for almost everyone is Practice or Thrive, not Balance.
- Enter your real license count, split between full time and part time by the 24 hour rule.
- Tick the add-ons you would really use: AI Scribe, Insurance Billing, Group Telehealth.
- Screenshot the total. That is your number, and it is the only one worth putting in a spreadsheet.
Five minutes. Do it before you compare Jane to anything else, including us.
What you are paying for, and it is not nothing
I run a competing product and I am still going to say this plainly: Jane is very good at the things a busy clinic touches forty times a day. Online booking is the best in this category, not marginally. The patient side is quick, the availability logic handles multi practitioner and multi room situations without a fight, and patients complete the booking instead of calling.
Support is the other thing. Jane lists chat, email and phone support with no plan gating, free data import, a complimentary onboarding call and an Account Setup Consultation with unlimited follow up sessions. Most vendors in this price range put phone support behind the top tier. Jane does not. If you have ever spent a Tuesday morning on hold with a software company while patients waited, you know what that is worth.
And the big one: Jane bills insurance. The Insurance Billing add-on at $20 a month exists, it submits claims, and if a meaningful share of your revenue arrives from payers, that single line closes the argument. Our software does not do it at all. No clearinghouse, no eligibility check, no denial management. If you bill insurance, stop reading comparison posts and buy the tool that bills insurance.
Processing fees are the quiet half of the bill
A software subscription is a fixed cost you notice. Card fees are a variable cost you do not. Take a practice doing 80 visits a month at $150.
| What the patient pays | Jane online 2.85% + $0.25 | Jane in person 2.6% + $0.10 |
|---|---|---|
| One $150 visit | $4.53 | $4.00 |
| 80 visits a month | $362 | $320 |
| Per year | $4,344 | $3,840 |
That is $504 a year of difference between taking the card at the front desk and taking it through the online portal, on identical revenue. Worth knowing before you route every payment through the booking flow because it is tidier.
For reference, SimplePractice lists 3.15% plus $0.30 on its pricing page, which on the same 80 visits comes to $402 a month, about $40 more than Jane online. Rates in this market sit in a narrow band and nobody wins a software decision on 30 basis points, but on $144,000 of annual card volume it is real money. If you want the full mechanics of card costs and how to price around them, we wrote a guide to setting cash-pay prices that covers the fee drag.
The bill at one, two and three practitioners
Here is the honest version of the comparison. For Jane, the base and the scribe are published and the per practitioner charge is not, so it appears as a variable. For our plans, every number is on our pricing page because we publish all of it.
| Practitioners | Jane Practice with AI Scribe | Jane Thrive with AI Scribe | Our software with AI scribe on |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $94 | $114 | $69 (Essential $49 + scribe $20) |
| 2 | $94 + 1 extra license + $15 | $114 + 1 extra license + $15 | $159 (Clinic $119 + scribe $20 x 2) |
| 3 | $94 + 2 extra licenses + $30 | $114 + 2 extra licenses + $30 | $179 (Clinic $119 + scribe $20 x 3) |
Our prices are the annual rate paid monthly. Month to month costs more: $59, $143 and $143 respectively for those same plans. Both sets of figures are list prices read on public pages on October 28, 2026, and you should check them yourself before signing anything.
Notice what the table says about one practitioner. At a single clinician, Jane Practice plus the scribe is $94 a month and our Essential plan plus the scribe is $69. That gap is $300 a year, which is not the kind of difference that should move a decision on its own. Several products are cheaper than both of us at one practitioner: Noterro at $33, Carepatron at $39, Practice Better at $35 on its Launch plan. If raw price is your only criterion, we are not the cheapest and neither is Jane.
What changes the arithmetic is the second and third clinician. Our Clinic plan covers one to three users for $119 and only the AI scribe is priced per head. Jane adds a license charge per practitioner on top of the base plan. For a three person clinic that difference compounds every month for as long as you own the software, which is why the unpublished number matters so much and why we put ours on a page anyone can read without a sales call.
[CAPTURA: la pantalla de precios de DrinCloud con los cinco planes y el escriba de IA, para que se vea que todos los importes están publicados]
Who should buy Jane, specifically
Buy Jane if any of these describe you:
- You bill insurance, or you will within a year. The $20 add-on is the whole ballgame.
- Online booking is your front door. Patients find you, book themselves, and nobody answers a phone. Jane's booking flow converts, and that is worth paying for.
- You want a human on the phone when something breaks. Jane includes phone, chat and email support on every plan, plus a setup call and free data import. Compare that to vendors that charge for onboarding.
- You are a multi disciplinary clinic with rooms and equipment. Jane handles practitioner plus room scheduling cleanly.
- Your team is comfortable in English only. Jane's product and support are English.
Jane gets expensive, or simply mismatched, if:
- You are cash-pay and will never file a claim. You are paying for architecture built around insurance billing. A practice that hands patients a receipt and nothing else has a simpler problem, which is why our superbill output is a PDF and not a claims engine.
- You are growing past three practitioners. Per license pricing is where the bill climbs, and you cannot model it from the published page.
- You need Spanish or Portuguese. Nobody in this competitive set, Jane included, runs support or the product interface in Spanish and Portuguese. If half your patients speak Spanish and your front desk does too, that matters daily.
- You wanted to start on Balance. The 20 appointment cap will catch you in month two.
If you are in the cash-pay group, the longer version of that argument is on our Jane App alternative page, including the parts where Jane wins.
What we do not do, said once and plainly
Our software does not bill insurance. It has no clearinghouse, no eligibility verification and no denial workflow, and it is not ONC certified, which only matters if you report to Medicare or MIPS. It does not do e-prescribing, so in states with an e-prescribing mandate such as California, Florida, New York, Michigan, Minnesota and Delaware you need a separate e-Rx platform. It does not ship a searchable CPT database, because that code set is licensed by the AMA, so your clinic types its own codes.
If any of those is a requirement, Jane is a better purchase than ours and I would rather you knew that from this page than from month three. The reason we can charge $119 for three users is precisely that we did not build the insurance half.
[CAPTURA: superbill en PDF generado desde una visita, con NPI, EIN, códigos CPT e ICD-10 y el saldo del paciente]
Frequently asked questions
How much does Jane App cost per month in 2026?
Jane lists Balance at $59, Practice at $79 and Thrive at $99 a month, each including one full time practitioner, with the AI Scribe at $15 per practitioner per month. Insurance billing is $20 a month per account plus $5 per additional full time practitioner. Those are list prices from Jane's pricing page on October 28, 2026.
What does Jane charge for an additional practitioner?
Jane does not publish that figure. The pricing page shows a per practitioner line with no amount and sends you to its "Calculate your monthly rate" widget, where you enter your full time and part time license counts to get an estimate. Clinics with 10 or more licenses are told to contact Jane directly.
Is the $59 Balance plan enough for a solo practice?
Usually not. Balance is capped at 20 appointments a month, counted by invoices created, and allows a single practitioner profile. A solo clinician seeing 15 patients a week passes that cap in the second week, so Practice at $79 is the realistic entry point.
Does Jane App charge for support or data import?
No. Jane lists chat, email and phone support on all three plans, plus free data import, a complimentary onboarding call and an Account Setup Consultation with unlimited follow ups. Support being included is normal in this market, so it should not be the deciding factor, but Jane's is better than most.
Can I use Jane if I do not bill insurance?
Yes, and plenty of cash-pay practices do, mainly for the booking experience. You are paying for claim infrastructure you will never touch, which is the trade. If you want the cheaper comparison for a self-pay practice, we laid it out in our write-up on choosing an EHR for a small practice and on the Jane comparison page.
What is the real total cost of ownership at three practitioners?
Take the plan base, add the per practitioner license charge from Jane's calculator, add $15 per practitioner for the scribe, add $20 plus $5 per extra full time practitioner if you bill insurance, then add roughly 3% of your card volume. For a three clinician practice doing $30,000 a month in card payments, the processing line alone is around $870 a month, which usually dwarfs the subscription.
The bottom line
Jane is a well built product with excellent booking and unusually good human support, and it bills insurance. Those three things are worth money. The pricing page is honest about everything except the one number that scales with your practice, and you can get that number in five minutes with its own calculator before you let a spreadsheet decide anything.
If you bill payers, buy Jane. If you are cash-pay, compare the all in cost at the practitioner count you expect to have in eighteen months, not today, and ask what the insurance half of the software is doing for you.
We built DrinCloud for clinics that charge the patient directly: charting with an AI scribe, online booking, payments and superbills, with every price published and no claims engine to pay for. See the full price list or read how we compare against Jane.
See it in your own practice
Live in three minutes, no setup fee, cancel anytime.